Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Attitudes of Chinese Adults to Breastfeeding in Public: A Web-Based Survey / Yun Zhao in Breastfeeding Medicine, Vol. 12, n°5 (Juin 2017)
Titre : Attitudes of Chinese Adults to Breastfeeding in Public: A Web-Based Survey Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Yun Zhao, Auteur ; Yan-Qiong Ouyang, Auteur ; Sharon R. Redding, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp. 316-321 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Allaitement en public
Attitude vis à vis de l'allaitement
Connaissances vis à vis de l'allaitement
Niveau socio économique
Résumé : "Objective: To explore Chinese adults’ perceptions and attitudes toward breastfeeding in public places.
Materials and Methods: This was a web-based survey including 10 items on breastfeeding participants (N = 2,021) who were recruited by convenience sampling.
Results: Almost 95% believed that public places should have lactation rooms, 86% thought it was acceptable for mothers to breastfeed in this location, and 65% of respondents agreed that it was acceptable for mothers to breastfeed in public. Though 47% believed that viewing women breastfeeding in public was embarrassing, more than 80% felt that breastfeeding in public was appropriate and decent and did not violate social morality. More than 90% of respondents approved of policies supporting breastfeeding in public. Women, married people, those who had children, had some knowledge about breastfeeding, or had the experience of viewing women breastfeeding in public were more likely to hold positive perceptions and attitudes toward breastfeeding in public places.
Conclusions: Prior experience and knowledge about breastfeeding have a great influence on people's perceptions and attitudes toward breastfeeding in public, so education about breastfeeding is very important. Breastfeeding education should not only include the techniques of breastfeeding practices but also include information policies that support breastfeeding in public, including the importance of lactation rooms." [Résumé de l'auteur]
in Breastfeeding Medicine > Vol. 12, n°5 (Juin 2017) . - pp. 316-321[article]Lactation Assessment Tools: A Qualitative Analysis of Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Tool Limitations and Suggested Improvements / Donna J. Chapman in Journal of Human Lactation, Vol. 34, n°4 (Novembre 2018)
Titre : Lactation Assessment Tools: A Qualitative Analysis of Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Tool Limitations and Suggested Improvements Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Donna J. Chapman, Auteur ; Joan Esper Kuhnly, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : pp. 682–690 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Consultant en lactation
Etude de cas ou de cohorte
Résumé : "Background
Several lactation assessment tools are available for in-hospital assessment of breastfeeding dyads, and their components vary widely. To date, no research has evaluated the perceptions of registered nurses (RNs) regarding the limitations and future improvements of these tools.
The aim was to describe RNs’ perceptions of the limitations of currently used lactation assessment tools and how these tools could be enhanced.
Focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with RNs (N = 28) whose current responsibilities included in-hospital breastfeeding assessment. Recruitment occurred from April through July 2015 at regional and international lactation conferences. Focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Two lactation researchers analyzed the transcripts to identify emerging themes and subthemes.
RNs identified three key limitations of the tools included being too subjective and time-consuming, difficulty in assessing audible swallows, and missing the big picture (e.g., overemphasizing numbers, being a snapshot in time). Suggested improvements focused on maternal characteristics (evolving breasts and nipples, holding it together, “got milk?,” risk factors, embracing the role), infant characteristics (day of life, latch/suck/swallow, baby’s “driving the bus,” risk factors for supplemental feeding), their interaction (two to tango, positioning, better qualitative descriptors), and tool organization (formatting and multiple versions).
RNs suggested novel components for consideration when developing future lactation assessment scales, including removing audible swallowing, adding mother/infant interactions, infant output, and expressible colostrum, and developing criteria specific to infant age. Future research should translate these suggestions into evidence-based indicators and evaluate the resulting proposed tools for reliability and validity. [Résumé de l'auteur]
in Journal of Human Lactation > Vol. 34, n°4 (Novembre 2018) . - pp. 682–690[article]