Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Development of the preterm infant breastfeeding behavior scale (PIBBS) : a study of nurse-mother agreement / KH Nysvist in Journal of Human Lactation, Vol.12 n°3 (Septembre 1996)
Titre : Development of the preterm infant breastfeeding behavior scale (PIBBS) : a study of nurse-mother agreement Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : KH Nysvist, Auteur ; C Rubertsson, Auteur Article en page(s) : pp.207-219 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Etudes d'observation
Prématuré (avant 37 semaines)
Index. décimale : PF.3 Grilles d?évaluation Résumé : Research on the development of preterm infant feeding behavior has focused mainly on bottlefeeding, using invasive methods or observations by professionals. In this study, a clinical method for observing breastfeeding was developed in collaboration between observers and mothers for the purpose of enabling neonatal personnel and mothers to describe developmental stages in preterm infant breastfeeding behavior. Tests of interobserver reliability resulted in acceptable agreement between observers, but a somewhat lower level of agreement between observers and mothers. The scale showed a good capacity to discriminate between infant gestational ages and can be used for helping mothers to identify their infants' emerging competence. Permalink :
in Journal of Human Lactation > Vol.12 n°3 (Septembre 1996) . - pp.207-219[article]Qualitative Analysis of Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Lactation Assessment Tools: Why and How They Are Completed / Joan Esper Kuhnly in Journal of Human Lactation, Vol. 34, n°1 (Février 2018)
Titre : Qualitative Analysis of Registered Nurses’ Perceptions of Lactation Assessment Tools: Why and How They Are Completed Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Joan Esper Kuhnly, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : pp. 32-39 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Infirmière
Résumé : "Background:
Although lactation assessment tools are consistently used in clinical practice, there is no evidence describing registered nurses’ perspectives regarding the purpose and thought processes involved when conducting a breastfeeding assessment.
This study aimed to explore registered nurses’ perceptions on the purpose of lactation assessment tools and the thought processes involved in completing one.
Seven focus groups were held from April 2015 through July 2015, in coordination with regional and international lactation and perinatal conferences. Participants included 28 hospital-based registered nurses who routinely used a lactation assessment tool to assess postpartum mothers with healthy breastfeeding newborns. Focus groups were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and content analyzed by two lactation researchers to identify relevant themes and subthemes.
The analyses identified four different purposes of breastfeeding assessment tools (Teaching and Assessing Simultaneously, Infant Safety, Standardized Practice, and “It’s Your Job!”) and four themes related to the thought processes used in completing the tool (Novice vs. Expert, Real-Time vs. Recalled Documentation, Observation or Not, and “Fudging the Score”).
Registered nurses found lactation assessment tool completion to be an essential part of their job and that it ensured infant safety, standardized care, maternal instruction, and lactation assessment. Differences in the lactation assessment tool completion process were described, based on staff expertise, workload, hospital policies, and varying degrees of compliance with established protocols. These findings provide critical insight for the development of future breastfeeding assessment tools."[resume de l'auteur]
in Journal of Human Lactation > Vol. 34, n°1 (Février 2018) . - pp. 32-39[article]